Archive for the ‘Mormon Renaissance’ Category

Nostalgia Unleashed

Last weekend my dad and littlest brother were in town from Florida for my graduation. After the festivities and celebration were over, the three of us decided to drive up to Smithfield, Utah and visit my grandparents for a day. My grandparents have lived in the same house since 1971 and my dad hadn’t been there in over 20 years, so naturally, he was excited. But maybe moreso to show my brother and I the rich, memory-laden history of his past. That’s what I want to delve into here: the power of nostalgia memory evokes and why such emotion is important both in our lives and to Mormon literature.

Read the rest of this entry »

High Expectations for Mormon Filmmakers: Robert Starling

After BYU’s Daily Universe published an article on Mormon film last week a lively discussion ensued on the ldsfilm email list. Robert Starling has allowed me to post his comments on Mormon Renaissance. As he explains, he’s been thinking about the dawning of a brighter day for Mormon film and media for a long time.

As in any genre, we can find both good and bad among LDS-oriented films. Let’s just hope that the genre survives long enough so that the “refiner’s fire” of the “great critics” and paying audiences will reward the best and weed out the rest. We as a people and a culture have many great stories that we need to tell in movies. Go back and read our Prophet Spencer W. Kimball’s talk (Given initially at BYU) on his vision of the arts. It still inspires me every time I read it: Read the rest of this entry »

Toward a Mormon Renaissance: Thoughts by James Goldberg

James Goldberg recently sent me the essay he read before two series of New Play Project’s religious plays (”Psalms” in Oct. 2006 and “Thorns & Thistles” in Oct. 2007). His sentiments resonated with me, so with his permission, I share them here:

Toward a Mormon Renaissance

In 1920, while riding on a train, Langston Hughes wrote a poem on the back of a napkin. Maybe you’ve heard it. It was called “The Negro Speaks of Rivers” and it goes like this:

I’ve known rivers:
I’ve known rivers ancient as the world and older than the
flow of human blood in human veins.

My soul has grown deep like the rivers.

I bathed in the Euphrates when dawns were young.
I built my hut near the Congo and it lulled me to sleep.
I looked upon the Nile and raised the pyramids above it.
I heard the singing of the Mississippi when Abe Lincoln
went down to New Orleans, and I’ve seen its muddy
bosom turn all golden in the sunset.

I’ve known rivers:
Ancient, dusky rivers.
My soul has grown deep like the rivers.

It’s a beautiful poem, I’ve always thought. And a wise poem. There’s something about the way that poem reaches so far back into the past and so deep down into the soul that communicates a grounded, mature kind of confidence. You know what I’m talking about? That’s a poem that can give depth and strength instead of just describing them.

It’s incredible that it does that, when you think about it, because that poem was written in 1920. You know what most people thought of black history and culture back in 1920? The vast majority of white Americans and all too many African-Americans thought of Black as different, backward, inferior: the blacker physically or culturally, the worse. There was nothing to be confident about, as far as most people were concerned. But Langston Hughes wrote my black soul is deep like the rivers and 86 years later we remember him for it. Not because he was the greatest individual writing talent of his day, but because he had something to say–something that went beyond himself. He wrote about the culture and heritage of his people with pride and artistry. He and other like-minded writers, not ashamed to call themselves Negro poets, gave this nation a literature of black dignity. All those individual writers, works, and goals clumped together are remembered as the Harlem Renaissance. And I hope that long after hundreds of movements from the last century have been forgotten, the Harlem Renaissance will be remembered; because America desperately needed the gift it offered to take another step toward being whole.

So. Here we are, 86 years later, in a makeshift theatre in the Mormon community. Mormonism is technically a religion, but it’s also a tradition and a people–trust me, my last name is Goldberg; I understand how these things work. A religion can form a people. It’s been done before.

This people is a good people. We have a rich heritage that goes back far beyond the founding of the church in 1830. We’ve got unique institutions that have helped us keep a sense of community in an age when many communities are falling apart. And we have wisdom, you know? We know something about how to treat each other, about our relationship to God, about the spiritual power that runs all through this world. And along with that, we’ve also got online resources with wisdom on food storage and stuff. Profound or practical, inherited wisdom is part of who we are.

And who are we? Unlike most tribes and peoples, none of this heritage is restricted to any ethnic group or country. Anyone can choose to adopt this heritage as part of their own identity. The whole world is getting less national and more global and Mormonism is one of the world’s first great post-national cultures.

All this means that Mormon writers, like the men and women of the Harlem Renaissance, have a lot to say…if—let me emphasize that—if we have the courage to undertake the same kind of project they did. I mean, black history and black culture in 1920 were already incredibly rich. The black community already had an incredible strength, but hardly anyone had ever managed to write about it in a meaningful, resonant, artistic way. There was a black tradition and a black heritage but no body of black literature. The Harlem Renaissance changed that, and that changed the world.

What I’m trying to say is that maybe it’s time for us to help change the world again. Look, I know it sounds arrogant to say that. I’m 24 years old, and the only times I can focus on theatre full-time are when I’ve saved up enough money to quit my day job for a few months. I mean, I don’t even have insurance–who am I to change the world? Who’s Katherine Gee or Ben Crowder? Who are any of the actors you’re going to see tonight? You know, most of them aren’t even trained actors. They’re just nice people who wanted to help us put on these plays.

Who are we? Well, we’re Latter-day Saints. We’re people who have wrestled with some of life’s big and little issues and have been lucky enough to have help. We’re people who think and act a little differently than most of the country does. We’re people who know a little about God and a little about life. And we’re people who believe that’s enough to say something big.

Are we going to make a difference? I hope so. And I take hope in history.

See, when Langston Hughes was sitting on that train in the evening, watching the sun set, when he wrote, with the voice of his people, “I’ve known rivers ancient as the world and older than the flow of human blood in human veins,” he was 18 years old.

The scripture says that through small and simple means great works will come to pass. And maybe with our work, your prayers, and the heritage that binds us, they will tonight. And maybe this will be a part of a process that people can look back on some day and call a Mormon Renaissance.

So, thanks for coming. And enjoy the show.

Perfecting the MLCA and Other Resources for Mormon Studies

My last post about the Mormon Literature & Creative Arts database generated some great suggestions for its improvement, and I thought I would respond by describing where we are at and how we see the MLCA feeding into a larger project of supporting Mormon Studies.

Read the rest of this entry »

Why a Database for Mormon Literature & Arts

The scriptures speak of those “kept from the truth because they know not where to find it” (D&C 123:12), and I believe as much can be said about Mormon works of literature and art as about LDS doctrine. Most people are very ignorant of what has been done. But unlike LDS doctrine, there is no canonized body of literary or artistic works that bear a divine imprint. How is it, then, that people get their ideas of the nature or quality of LDS artistic works? Well, I think they draw their conclusions based on what is visible to them commercially and what is discussed socially. So, for most Mormons, “Mormon literature” probably equates in their minds to the genres that have been most popular through LDS retailers in recent years: 1) historical fiction (Gerald Lund, Ron Carter, etc.); 2) Young Adult fiction (Jack Weyland, Dean Hughes, etc.), and 3) LDS Romance fiction (Anita Stansfield, Rachel Nunes, etc.). Each of these is an important genre deserving attention, but there is so much more! This is one reason we created the Mormon Literature & Creative Arts database years ago. We wanted there to be a place where, as much as possible, Read the rest of this entry »

Mormon Renaissance: Why We’re Doing This

“The European Renaissance was a period of 300 years. For the Mormon Renaissance, patience is in order–as well as tolerance and encouragement for those in the apprenticeship of their craft, or those who are willing to experiment with new forms of expression or media . . . . Mormon pens have awakened, and we would do better to measure and commend each moment of literary progress, than to await the messianic arrival of some future Mormon Milton.”– Gideon Burton, “Our Mormon Renaissance”

It seems ironic that upon entering the intelligentsia of the Mormon community, one must almost swear off one’s own culture, speaking of it derogatorily if at all. This trend seems particularly prominent among BYU graduates who feel the need to defend their participation in this flagship of Mormon culture: they claim an education in the Church but not of the Church.

Read the rest of this entry »

Mormon Renaissance: What We’re Doing

The posts of this blog will focus primarily on the Mormon artistic efforts taking place at BYU and the surrounding area for two reasons. First, our bloggers are all currently based at BYU, so naturally the things that we can write about tend to be a little BYU-centric. This is not out of chauvinism but out of necessity. Second, we will focus on BYU-based efforts because so much is happening here in terms of experimental Mormon art that just never reaches an audience outside the university. Even with the BYU community, few are aware of all the innovations being attempted.

That said, we do not necessarily limit ourselves to BYU-affiliated events; we would like to cover all avenues of Mormon artistic expression. Also, simply because the events we discuss are taking place at BYU doesn’t mean the artistic principles we learn from them will be limited by the bounds of the campus. We believe the discussion of these specific events can be helpful in advancing the cause of Mormon art in general.

Examples of topics we hope to discuss include: Read the rest of this entry »